Sai Satcharitra - Chapter IX
Effect of compliance and Non-compliance with Baba's Orders at the Time of Taking Leave - A few Instances - Mendicancy and Its Necessity - Devotees' (Tarkhad family's) Experiences - Baba fed sumptuously - How?
At the end of the last chapter, it was barely stated that the Bhaktas, who obeyed Baba's orders at the time of taking leave, fared well and those, who disobeyed them, suffered many a mishap. This statement will be amplified and illustrated, with a few striking instances; and by other matters dealt with in this Chapter.
Characteristic of Shirdi - Pilgrimage
One special peculiarity of Shirdi-pilgrimage was this, that none
could leave Shirdi, without Baba's permission; and if he did,
he invited untold sufferings, but if any one was asked to quit
Shirdi, he could stay there no longer. Baba gave certain suggestions
or hints, when Bhaktas went to bid good-bye and take leave. These
suggestions had to be followed. If they were not followed or were
departed from, accidents were sure to befall them, who acted contrary
to Baba's directions. We give below a few instances.
Tatya Kote Patil
Tatya Kote was once going in a tanga to Kopargaon bazar. He came
in haste to the Masjid, saluted Baba, and said that he would go
to Kopargaon bazar. Baba said, "Don't make haste, stop a
little, let go the bazar, don't go out of the village". On
seeing has anxiety to go, Baba asked him to take Shama (Madhavrao
Deshpande) at least with him. Not minding this direction, Tatya
Kote immediately drove his tanga. Of the two horses one, which
cost Rs.300/- was very active and restless. After passing Sawli Vihir, it began to run rashly, got a sprain in its waist and fell
down. Tatya was not much hurt, but was reminded of Mother Sai's
direction. On another occasion while proceeding to Kolhar village,
he disregarded Baba's direction, and drove in a tanga, which met
with a similiar accident.
European Gentleman
One European gentleman of Bombay once came to Shirdi, with an
introductory note from Nanasaheb Chandorkar, and with some object
in view. He was comfortably accommodated in a tent. He wanted
to kneel before Baba and kiss His hand. Therefore, he tried thrice
to step into the Masjid, but Baba prevented him from doing so.
He was asked to sit in the open court-yard below and take Baba's
darshan from there. Not pleased with this reception he got, he
wanted to leave Shirdi at once and came to bid good-bye. Baba
asked him to go the next day and not to hurry. People also requested
him to abide by Baba's direction. Not listening to all this, he
left Shirdi in a tanga. The horses ran at first all right, but
when Sawli Vihir was passed, a bicycle came in front, seeing which
the horses were frightened and ran fast. The tanga was turned
topsy-turvy and the gentleman fell down and was dragged some distance.
He was immediately released; but had to go and lie in Kopargaon
hospital for the treatment of the injuries. Because of such experiences
all people learnt the lesson, that those who disobeyed Baba's
instruction met with accidents in one way or the other, and those
who obeyed them were safe and happy.
The Necessity of Mendicancy
Now to return to the question of mendicancy. A question may arise
in the minds of some that if Baba was such a great personage -
God in fact, why should He have recourse to the begging bowl,
all His lifetime? This question may be considered and replied
from two standpoints. (1) Who are the fit persons, who have a
right to live by the begging-bowl? Our Shastras say that those
persons, who, getting rid of, or becoming free from the three
main Desires, viz. (1) for progeny, (2) for wealth, (3) for fame,
accept Sannyas, are the fit persons to live by begging alms. They
cannot make cooking arrangements and dine at home. The duty of
feeding them rests on the shoulders of house-holders. Sai Baba
was neither a house-holder nor Vanaprastha. He was a celibate
sannyasi, i.e., sannyasi from boyhood. His firm conviction was
that the universe was His home, He was the Lord Vasudeva - the
Supporter of the universe and the Imperishable Brahman. So He
had the full right to have recourse to the begging-bowl. (2) Now
from the standpoint of (1) Pancha-soon - five sins and their atonement.
We all know that in order to prepare food-stuffs and meals, the
householders have to go through five actions or processes, viz.
(1) Kandani-Pounding, (2) Peshani-Grinding, (3) Udakumbhi - Washing
pots, (4) Marjani - Sweeping and cleaning, (5) Chulli-Lighting
hearths. These processes involve destruction of a lot of small
insects and creatures, and thus the householders incur a lot of
sin. In order to atone for this sin, our Shastras prescribe five
kinds of sacrifices, viz. (1) Brahma-Yajna, (2) vedadhyayan -
offerings to Brahman or the study of the Vedas. (3) Pitra-Yajna-offerings
to the ancestors, 4)Deva-Yajna - offerings to the Gods, (5) Bhoota-Yajna-offerings
to the beings, (6) Manushya-Atithi-Yajna-offerings to men or uninvited
guests. If these sacrifices, enjoined by the Shastras are duly
performed, the purification of their minds is effected and this
helps them to get knowledge and self-realization. Baba, in going
from house to house, reminded the inmates of their sacred duty,
and fortunate were the people, who got the lesson at their homes
from Baba.
Devotee's Experiences
Now to return to the other more interesting subject. Lord Krishna
has said in the Bhagawadgeeta (9-26) "Whosoever devoutly
offers to me a leaf, a flower, or a fruit or water, of that pure-hearted
man, I accept that pious offering." In the case of Sai Baba,
if a devotee really longed to offer anything to Sai Baba, and
if he afterwards forgot to offer the same, Baba reminded him,
or his friend about the offering, and made him present it to Him,
and then accepted it and blessed the devotee. A few instances
are given below.
Tarkhad Family (father and son)
Mr. Ramachandra Atmaran alias Babasaheb Tarkhad, formerly a Prarthana-Samajist, was a staunch devotee of Sai Baba. His wife and son loved Baba equally or perhaps more. It was once proposed that Master Tarkhad should go with his mother to Shirdi and spend his May vacation there, but the son was unwilling to go, as he thought that in case he left his home at Bandra, the worship of Sai Baba in the house would not be properly attended to, as his father being a Prarthana Samajist, would not care to worship Sai Baba's enlarged portrait. However, on his father's giving an assurance of oath, that he would perform the worship exactly as the son was doing, the mother and the son left for Shirdi on one Friday night.
Next day (Saturday) Mr. Tarkhad got up early, took his bath and before proceeding with the Puja, prostrated himself before the Shrine and said - "Baba, I am going to perform the Puja exactly as my son has been doing, but please let it not be a formal drill." After he performed the Puja, he offered a few pieces of lump-sugar as naivedya (offering), which were distributed at the time of the lunch.
That evening and on Sunday, everything went on well. The following Monday was a working day and it also passed well. Mr. Tarkhad, who had never performed Puja like this in all his life, felt great confidence within himself, that every thing was passing on quite satisfactorily according to the promise given to his son. On Tuesday, he performed the morning Puja as usual and left for his work. Coming home at noon, he found that there was no Prasad (sugar) to partake of, when the meal was served. He asked the servant - cook, who told him that there was no offering made that morning, and that he had completely forgotten then to perform that part of the Puja (offering naivedya). After hearing that he left his seat and prostrated himself before the Shrine, expressed his regret, at the same time chiding Baba for the want of guidance in making the whole affair a matter of mere drill. Then he wrote a letter to his son stating the facts and requested him to lay it before Baba's feet and ask His pardon for his neglect.
This happened in Bandra at Tuesday noon.
At about the same time, when the noon Arati was just about to
commence in Shirdi, Baba said to Mrs. Tarkhad, "Mother, I
had been to your house in Bandra, with a view to having something
to eat. I found the door locked. I somehow got an entrance inside
and found to My regret, that Bhau (Mr. Tarkhad) had left nothing
for Me to eat. so I have returned from there without eating anything."
The lady could not understand anything; but the
son, who was close by, understood that there was something wrong
with the Puja in Bandra and he, therefore, requested Baba to permit
him to go home. Baba refused the permission, but allowed him to
perform Puja there. Then, the son wrote a letter to his father,
stating all that took place at Shirdi and implored his father
not to neglect the Puja at home.
Both these letters crossed each other and were delivered to the
respective parties the next day.
Is this not astonishing?
Mrs. Tarkhad
Let us now take up the case of Mrs. Tarkhad herself. She offered
three things, viz. (1) Bharit (roasted brinjal egg plant mixed
curds and spice). (2) Kacharya (circular pieces of brinjal fried
in ghee), (3) Peda. Let us see how Baba accepted
them.
Once Mr. Raghuvir Bhaskar Purandare of Bandra,
a great devotee of Baba started for Shirdi with his family. Mrs
Tarkhad went to Mrs. Purandare, and gave her two brinjals and
requested her to prepare Bharit of one bringal and Kacharya of
the other, when she went to Shirdi and serve Baba with them. After
reaching Shirdi, Mrs. Purandare went with her dish of Bharit to
the Masjid when Baba was just about to start his meals. Baba found
the Bharit very tasty. So He distributed it to all and said that
He wanted Kacharyas now. A word was sent to Radha Krishna-Mai,
that Baba wanted Kacharyas. She was in a fix, as that was no season
of brinjals. How to get brinjals was the question? When an enquiry
was made as to who brought the Bharit, it was found that Mrs.
Purandare was also entrusted with the duty of serving Kacharyas.
Everybody then came to know the significance of Baba's enquiry
regarding Kacharyas, and was wonderstruck at Baba's all-pervasive
knowledge.
In December 1915 A.D., one Govind Balaram Mankar wanted to go
to Shirdi to perfrom the obsequies of his father. Before he left,
he came to see Mr. Tarkhad. Then Mrs. Tarkhad wanted to send something
with him to Baba. She searched the whole house but found nothing,
except a Peda, which had already been offered as naivedya. Mr.
Mankar was in mourning. Still out of great devotion to Baba, she
sent the Peda with him, hoping that Baba would accept and eat
it. Govind went to Shirdi and saw Baba, but forgot to take the
Peda with him. Baba simply waited. When again he went to Baba
in the afternoon, he went empty-handed without the Peda. Baba
could wait no longer and, therefore, asked him straight, "What
did you bring for me?" "Nothing" was the reply.
Baba asked him again. The same reply came forth again. Then Baba
asked him the leading question, "Did not the mother (Mrs.
Tarkhad) give some sweet to you for Me at the time of your
starting?" The boy then remembered the whole thing. He felt
abashed, asked Baba's pardon, ran to his lodging, brought the
Peda and gave it to Baba. As soon as Baba got it in His hand.
He put it into His mouth and gulped it down. Thus the devotion
of Mrs. Tarkhad was recognized and accepted. "As men believe
in Me, so do I accept them" (Gita, 4-11) was proved in this
case.
Baba Fed Sumptuously, -- How?
Once, Mrs. Tarkhad was staying in a certain house in Shirdi. At
noon, meals were ready and dishes were being served, when a hungry
dog turned up there and began to cry, Mrs. Tarkhad got up at once
and threw a piece of bread, which the dog gulped with great relish.
In the afternoon, when she went to the Masjid and sat at some
distance, Sai Baba said to her, "Mother, you have fed Me
sumptuously up to my throat, My afflicted pranas (life-forces)
have been satisfied. always act like this, and this will stand
you in good stead. Sitting in this Masjid I shall never, never
speak untruth. Take pity on Me like this. First give bread to
the hungry, and then eat yourself. Note this well." She could
not at first understand the meaning of what Baba said. So she
replied -- "Baba, how could I feed You? I am myself dependent
on others and take my food from them on payment." Then Baba
replied -- "Eating that lovely bread I am heartily contended
and I am still belching. The dog which you saw before meals and
to which you gave the piece of bread is, one with Me, so also
other creatures (cats, pigs, flies, cows etc.) are one with Me.
I am roaming in their forms. He, who sees Me in all these creatures
is My beloved. So abandon the sense of duality and distinction,
and serve Me, as you did today." Drinking these nectar-like
words, she was moved, her eyes were filled with tears, her throat
was choked and her joy knew no bounds.
Moral
"See God in all beings" is the moral of this chapter.
The Upanishads, the Geeta and the Bhagwat, all exhort us to perceive
God or Divinity in all the creatures. By the instance given at
the end of this Chapter and other numerous to mention. Sai
Baba has practically demonstrated to us how to put the Upanishadic
teachings into practice. In this way Sai Baba stands as the best
Exponent or Teacher of the Upanishadic doctrines.
Bow to Shri Sai - Peace be to all